Loading…
21
Chat with a museum curator made me rethink 'perfect' repairs
I was fixing a 1960s Nikon F for a local history museum, and the curator asked me to leave a specific scratch on the baseplate. She said it was from a protest photographer in '68, and that removing it would 'erase the story'. I've always aimed for flawless restoration, but that stuck with me. When do you decide to preserve history over fixing every mark? I'm curious how other repairers handle this kind of thing.
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
morgan.jason6mo ago
Flawless restoration is the whole point of the job. That scratch is just damage, not history. If you start leaving every mark, you end up with a broken artifact. Museums have placards to tell the story; the object itself should be returned to its original working condition. Letting sentiment decide technical work is a slippery slope.
4
harperp246mo ago
Scratches tell stories too, @morgan.jason.
-1
young.ryan6mo ago
The 1903 Wright Flyer at the Smithsonian still has its original fabric tears from Kitty Hawk. Those "flaws" are the only physical proof of how it landed. Erasing every mark erases the first flight itself.
7