Client wanted cheap parts for a Canon AE-1 fix, left me thinking
I was fixing a Canon AE-1 with a slow shutter. The owner asked me to use generic parts instead of real ones to save cash. I told them it might not last, but they didn't care. It got me wondering about right and wrong in repairs. How do you handle requests like this?
Wait, why is this even a moral thing? They knew the risk and chose it anyway. You did your job by telling them. It's not like you're putting bad brakes in a car, it's an old camera. If it breaks again, they'll just be out some money, not hurt.
Sold a Canon 5D Mark II last year that had a known shutter issue. I made sure to list every single flaw in the eBay description and even included a video of it working before the sale. It's not just about money, it's about trust. If someone buys a broken thing, they might not come back or could leave bad feedback. Even with old gear, being upfront saves you from headaches later. Have you ever had a buyer get upset over something you thought was obvious?
Remember that time you bought a used guitar and the seller "forgot" to mention the wiring was totally shot? I paid less than market value, but that first gig with a loud, constant hum (from the guitar, not the crowd) was so embarrassing. The discount didn't feel like a deal anymore, just a reminder that someone knew and didn't say.