Loading…
7
That 'evidence' in the bee die-off article was a stock photo from 2011
Ran into a viral piece claiming neonicotinoids were killing 40% of hives in Ohio, and the 'damning lab photo' was literally a Getty image of a wasp nest. Took me 2 hours of reverse image searching to find the original upload, way longer than I expected for a quick fact check. The article cited a 2014 study but slapped a 2025 date on it, and the author's bio linked to a supplement store. Anyone else notice these pseudo-science pieces leaning harder on recycled visuals to push a panic angle?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
patricia321mo ago
Gotta wonder if we're overthinking this one. Sure, the photo mixup is sloppy, but bees do have real problems, and not every bad article means the whole thing is fake. I spent ten minutes checking the date and gave up, half these posts are just recycling old stuff for clicks anyway. Maybe the panic angle is tired, but the underlying issue is still worth a second look. Not saying the article was good, just saying the sky ain't falling because of one stock photo.
1
wood.uma1mo ago
Found an old bee article from 2017 the other day. Same stock photo, same scare headline. Just recycled with a new date. @patricia32, you're right that bees matter, but this whole thing felt like watching a rerun. My neighbor once swore a swarm was coming for his tomatoes. Turned out it was just a fat bumblebee stuck in his screen door. Point is, sometimes the panic is louder than the problem.
2