22
Debunked a moon landing hoax claim with satellite imaging in 20 mins
Compared side by side the famous shadow angle pics with current LRO data and the geometry lines up perfectly at 3 different crater sites. Has anyone else used actual orbital photos to shut down the whole 'studio lighting' theory?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
gracethomas1m ago
Man, the studio lighting crowd must be real quiet after that one. It's almost funny how they never seem to bring up the LRO data when it's right there for anyone to check. You'd think if the whole thing was a hoax, someone would've caught a mismatch by now, but nope. The shadows just sit there matching up perfectly across three different craters. Guess their whole theory needs a flashlight and a cardboard box to survive. At this point it's less a debate and more a game of whack-a-mole with new bad math. Keep posting the orbital shots, it's the fastest way to end the convo.
10
That studio lighting theory falls apart even harder when you run the numbers on the LRO's own shadow data.
6